Quantcast
Business Government

1 In 4 Connecticut Residents Applied for Unemployment

Department of Labor building. Courtesy of CTNewsJunkie.com

The Department of Labor has also urged beneficiaries to monitor their accounts to make sure their direct deposits continue to reach their bank accounts.

By Christine Stuart, CTNewsJunkie.com 

Connecticut Labor Commissioner Kurt Westby announced Wednesday that his department has now received a million applications for unemployment since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We’ve reached a milestone no one wanted to get to,” Westby said.

Westby said to put the numbers in perspective, it means that “over the past seven months we’ve received more applications than we usually get in eight years.” That means 1 out of every 4 Connecticut residents has applied for unemployment at some point during the pandemic.

The department, which struggled at the beginning of the pandemic to get the applications processed within six weeks at the height of the pandemic, is now processing applications within one to three days.

The Connecticut Department of Labor has paid out $5.2 billion in unemployment compensation across available programs. It also has applications in to the federal government to borrow $550 million through the year’s end to bolster the trust fund it uses to pay out benefits, having tapped $370 million in federal loans to date.

An estimated 232,000 people are currently receiving benefits and 1,007,500 applications have been received since March 13 when Gov. Ned Lamont declared the public health emergency.

As of Oct. 4, unemployment compensation beneficiaries could claim an extra $18 a week, pushing to $667 the maximum amount they can claim, which is typically half of their average pay prior to losing a job or income stream if self-employed. Entering August, a $600 weekly bonus that had been authorized under the CARES Act expired.

Congress is deadlocked on a new aid package.

Meanwhile, the DOL has also urged beneficiaries to monitor their accounts to make sure their direct deposits continue to reach their bank accounts.

The agency and law enforcement are investigating claims that individuals saw their deposits over the past few weeks disappear because unbeknownst to them, their bank information had been changed.

“With the implementation of multiple federal unemployment programs launched in response to the pandemic, labor agencies across the country are seeing an uptick in criminal activity around unemployment claims. Cyber security experts recommend regular account maintenance to preserve the integrity and security of your personal information,” Westby said.

Republished with permission from CTNewsJunkie.com, all rights reserved.

Like what you see here? Click here to subscribe to We-Ha’s newsletter so you’ll always be in the know about what’s happening in West Hartford! Click the blue button below to become a supporter of We-Ha.com and our efforts to continue producing quality journalism.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
  •  
  •  
  •   

About the author

We-Ha

We-Ha.com is the place to go for the latest information about West Hartford – a town that "has it all"! We-Ha.com is part of and proud of our community, and we bring a hyperlocal focus to news and features about the people, schools, businesses, real estate, sports, restaurants, charitable events, arts, and more. Contact us at: [email protected] or [email protected]

2 Comments

  • With less than 4 million residents, and excluding the 25% of population who are under 16 and who are retired, the department of labor is saying that one in three people in connecticut has been laid off their job (or gig) since March. What am I missing here? Did the state waive the requirement for recent taxable employment and are all the thousands of people who never work now considered a ‘gig worker’ who is eligible for unemployment? Are all gig workers regardless of whether had any slowdown still eligible? How could one third of working age eligible people have applied for unemployment since March. This does not align.

  • Is someting fishy or fraudulent going on that everyone is hush hush about for some reason? My personal knowledge is that one third of the state did not recently temporarily or permanenetly lose a job. So what am I missing…. I’ve been so busy working since February that I haven’t been paying attentionand haven’t that one third the state lost their jobs. My neighbors and friedns and family have been working and I haven’t heard disussion or seen evidence of one third the state being out of work. this story stunned me, can someone enlighten and realign the figures with the evident reality I’ve experienced

Leave a Comment

Translate »