Bipartisan Budget, Partisan Implementer Signed into Law

Published On: June 23, 2021Categories: Government
Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

Gov. Ned Lamont signs the budget on June 23. Photo credit: Christine Stuart, CTNewsJunkie.com

The revenue West Hartford will receive under the adopted state budget matches the amount in the Town Council’s adopted budget for FY2022.

By Hugh McQuaid, CTNewsJunkie.com 

West Hartford-specific information provided by Ronni Newton, We-Ha.com

Democrats and one Republican were on hand Wednesday to watch the governor sign the two-year state budget, which relies heavily on one-time federal funding, but abstains from major tax increases.

Gov. Ned Lamont signed the $46.7 billion package during a short afternoon ceremony at the state Capitol building. The tax and spending plan for the next two years was approved with bipartisan support by the legislature earlier this month.

“We want to do everything we can to make Connecticut more affordable for our working families and our middle class and that’s what this budget does,” Lamont said.

The budget makes use of $1.75 billion in one-time federal revenue to help achieve a number of progressive goals including expanding the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit, dedicating millions in new funding to nonprofit service providers, and increasing state aid to municipalities through hikes in education grants and restructuring a program for non-taxable municipal property.

“This is transformative, I think, in terms of municipal aid,” Senate President Martin Looney said. “It builds equity into the formula in a way that had not previously existed.”

Although the budget attracted 22 Republican votes in the House and support from all but four Republican senators, only Rep. Holly Cheeseman of Niantic, the ranking minority member on the Finance Committee, made the trip to Hartford for the ceremonial bill signing Wednesday.

“This budget makes great investment in our communities, in our citizens in addressing some of the needs that have been revealed and exacerbated during the pandemic,” Cheeseman said.

Lamont also signed the more controversial implementer bill, an 800-page document which administers the budget but contains a multitude of other policies negotiated by the governor and lawmakers.

The implementer bill, which was passed with no Republican support, contained provisions on a wide range of topics. For instance, some sections updated voter registration systems and restored the voting rights of parolees. Another section requires that towns with sports team names or mascots depicting Native Americans change the offending material or risk losing grants through a fund supported by revenues generated from the two tribal casinos.

West Hartford was one of the towns identified to lose future revenues generated by the casinos due to Conard High School having the nickname “Chieftains.” All mascots and imagery associated with the Chieftain name, as well as the Warrior name which has been retained by Hall High School, were removed in 2015, following a vote by the Board of Education.

The current year allocation to West Hartford from slot machine revenues is roughly $28,000, but that number could grow in future years. The legislature clarified through the final approval process for the implementer that the section related to the grants from casino revenues does not take effect until the second year of the two-year budget, on July 1, 2022, and at that point the towns have a year to make a change.

“In the coming months I will discuss the matter with corporation counsel, the superintendent of schools, and other key stakeholders in order to properly advise the Town Council of the town’s options,” West Hartford Town Manager Matt Hart said. Because the implementation date is set as July 1, 2022, Hart said the town has some time to act.

“Listen, I think the principles within the implementer are certainly something that both parties support,” Rep. Sean Scanlon, co-chair of the Finance Committee, said. “There were things that were in the implementer that people found objectionable, but I think that, by and large, an overwhelming majority of what was in both those documents are things that both caucuses support.”

Republished with permission from CTNewsJunkie.com, all rights reserved.

Like what you see here? Click here to subscribe to We-Ha’s newsletter so you’ll always be in the know about what’s happening in West Hartford! Click the blue button below to become a supporter of We-Ha.com and our efforts to continue producing quality journalism.

Leave A Comment