Government Public Works

More Than 100 West Hartford Residents Attend Meeting on 'Save Money and Reduce Trash' Program

More than two dozen West Hartford residents spoke at a public meeting Wednesday night about 'SMART' as a possible solution to waste management. Photo credit: Ronni Newton
liam sweeney 2017 cube
gop cube 2017
chris barnes 2017 cube
Watkinson ad 1 2017

More than two dozen people spoke at the public information session Wednesday night at West Hartford Town Hall.

More than two dozen West Hartford residents spoke at a public meeting Wednesday night about 'SMART' as a possible solution to waste management. Photo credit: Ronni Newton

More than two dozen West Hartford residents spoke at a public meeting Wednesday night about ‘SMART’ as a possible solution to waste management. Photo credit: Ronni Newton

By Ronni Newton

Director of Public Works John Phillips, along with WasteZero Vice President of Municipal Partnerships Kristen Brown, presented a thorough overview Wednesday night of what a “Save Money and Reduce Trash” (SMART) program in West Hartford might look like and what the financial considerations of implementation would be, followed by a spirited question and answer period with more than two dozen residents who lined up to speak.

An estimated 140 people attended the session at West Hartford Town Hall, the first of three public meetings that will be held to inform residents about the SMART program. Phillips said he has spent the past two years becoming educated about the program.

Initial reactions to the proposed program were mixed, with some residents opposing paying more when they are already good recyclers, some understanding that there is a trash crisis and this is the best solution, and others calling the program a hidden tax.

Examples of different sizes (13-, 8-, and 30-gallon) of municipal waste bags were on display at West Hartford Town Hall. Photo credit: Ronni Newton

Examples of different sizes (13-, 8-, and 30-gallon) of municipal waste bags were on display at West Hartford Town Hall. Photo credit: Ronni Newton

West Hartford needs to reduce its waste, and to achieve that is considering a transformation of the funding for trash removal. As part of SMART, 30-gallon municipal trash bags would be sold for $2. Bags would be available in grocery, drug, and other stores where residents typically purchase plastic trash bags.

Brown said that her calculations indicate that the average West Hartford residence would use 0.9 bags per week.

A tall kitchen bag (the 13-gallon size that fits in most standard kitchen trash barrels) would cost $1.25, and smaller bags would cost $0.80. The town would receive the money from the sale of the bags, and that in turn would fund a portion of the trash removal budget.

The municipal bags would then go into existing trash barrels, and curbside collection of the green barrels would not otherwise be changed. WasteZero Vice President Stephen Lisauskas, who also attended Wednesday’s meeting, said that the trash collection trucks would be equipped with camera and sensors that could determine the colors of the bags, and an automated system would be put in place to ensure that residents comply with the SMART program.

Phillips said that a trash crisis is looming, and while West Hartford will have a contract in place for disposal of its trash through 2024, capacity in the state is shrinking with the closing of one incinerator. He said he doesn’t know where the trash will be able to go after 2024.

Even though the town has a contract with Covanta for disposal, Phillips said the cost will likely escalate. He said that Covanta told him that “they would talk” and he would receive more information in November. “They’re not going to call and say the price is going to go down,” Phillips said.

West Hartford currently pays $66 per ton in tip fees, and that is projected to increase to $80-$100 per ton. The town generates approximately 20,000 tons of trash each year.

Phillips said that some people say education about recycling will help reduce that volume, and some residents who spoke Wednesday reiterated that. “We’re not going to educate ourselves out of this … everything has gotten lighter, smaller, and we still hover around 20,000 tons,” Phillips said. The town is stuck at a 27-30 percent recycling rate, but the state mandate is to increase the diversion rate to 60 percent by 2024.

“Let’s treat our waste like the utility it really is,” Phillips said. “We’re very good at collecting it and I understand from a residential perspective that it’s not a broken system.”

Trash is a “linear expense,” Phillips said. Tax dollars pay for it and then it’s burned. Recycling, he said, is circular, creates a whole new market, and is a better use of taxpayer dollars.

Phillips knows that West Hartford’s bi-weekly collection is insufficient, and said that the tax savings could be used to implement weekly recycling. Food waste recycling is something that is on the horizon as well, he said.

Brown provided statistics about unit-based waste management programs that have been implemented in other towns and cities where trash generation has dramatically dropped as soon as the program begins. More than 40 percent of Massachusetts uses it, and it’s mandatory in Vermont and about to be implemented throughout Rhode Island. Nationwide nearly 7,000 communities use unit-based pricing and it’s very common throughout Europe.

Brown also said that an average West Hartford household will pay less under a SMART program. Currently the average household pays $244 on trash service and disposal – $217 through taxes for trash service and $27 for trash bags. Under a SMART program, the tax dollars allocated to trash collection would drop to an average of $114 per household and bags would cost $91, for a total average cost of $205.

Bob Moylan implemented a highly-successful SMART program in Worcester, MA, more than 20 years ago. The retired public works commissioner told the audience that the program works and is the most effective way of reducing trash generation. “That little pinch of buying the special bag is going to make [residents] think.

Resident Meg Sheehan said she favors educating people first, starting with the households that have two trash barrels. “This feels like a penalty for those who are already doing the right thing,” she said. Sheehan said she would also like to see a line item on the bill showing the tax impact for complete transparency.

Douglas Waterston said he worries that this would be a “regressive tax” on young families that generate more waste.

Theresa Battaglio said she already has to pay someone to vacuum her leaves and to snow blow which she can’t do herself because of back problems.”I pay to go to Starbucks and park my car and you say I’m going to have savings. I want commitment from the Council that my tax is going to go down,” she said, and she would put that money aside in a pot to use it to buy bags.

Chris Nelson, who is a member of the Clean Energy Task Force, said that “trash is a utility and should be treated as one.” People would not want their energy costs to be paid for through taxes because there would be no personal control or reason to seek efficiencies. “Adoption of SMART would put in place the individual signal that’s missing” and would also be a cost saving to the town.

Jesse Samuels said he would like to see the town expand facilities to deposit recyclables to other areas of town like Bishops Corner because a lack of facilities dis-incentivizes people to get rid of waste. He also expressed concern about balancing waste reduction with use of water to make sure recyclables are clean.

Jaen Andrews said she feels like this is an additional cost which doesn’t make her happy but thinks “what’s really missing is education. She said there needs to be a better way about finding out about opportunities like textile recycling and does not find the town’s website useful.

“This is important not just for financial reasons,” said resident Judy Allen. “I tend not to change my behavior unless someone says you have to do that. This is an opportunity for us to do more about living sustainably and environmentally responsible,” she said.

“Why would we not want to take control of our future?” asked Diane Duva. The questions and comments were “heartfelt and meaningful,” she said, and major changes are always hard at first. “This isn’t about getting a tax rebate. This is about giving the town an ability to repurpose what would be wasted.”

Dave Peterson said it is “disingenuous to say this is making us green. This is about saving West Hartford money.” He refuted the savings that Brown had outlined and said that buying a bag is a tax, and we will get less for our tax dollars. However, Peterson added that he would accept it as a tax increase “for the sake of saving the town that I grew up in – one of best towns in America.”

“This is not a green issue. It’s a cost issue and a ‘what are we going to do with it’ issue,” Phillips said after the meeting.

SMART is still in the concept stage and Town Manager Ron Van Winkle said he would like to show it as an option in the next fiscal year budget but there are no plans yet to implement it.

There are two more pubic meeting to discuss SMART:

  • Wednesday, Jan.25, at 7 p.m., in the King Philip Middle School Auditorium
  • Wednesday, Feb. 1, at 2 p.m., at Elmwood Community Center

Click here for more information about the program. A link to Brown’s PowerPoint presentation will be also added once it has been posted on the town’s website.

Like what you see here? Click here to subscribe to We-Ha’s newsletter so you’ll always be in the know about what’s happening in West Hartford!

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Geico cube david johnson 2017
klaus larsen cube ad
kaoud cube
Jeff Brand State Farm 2017 cube
adventure with God
jcc gene machine cube
ct forum laughter ad
jcc nathan englander ad

About the author

We-Ha

We-Ha.com is the place to go for the latest information about West Hartford – a town that "has it all"! We-Ha.com is part of and proud of our community, and we bring a hyperlocal focus to news and features about the people, schools, businesses, real estate, sports, restaurants, charitable events, arts, and more. Contact us at: [email protected] or [email protected]

8 Comments

  • “Currently the average household pays $244 on trash service and disposal – $217 through taxes for trash service and $27 for trash bags.”

    120 kitchen size bags at Target is $16. So the town is saying that most people only buy trash bags twice a year?

    Umm, maybe if you’re single and spend half of the year traveling you spend $27 on trash bags. For families with kids, it is a lot higher.

    This is nothing more than nickel and diming residents for more taxes.

    • I have a family of 4 with 2 kids and we throw out two trash bags per week, which amounts to 104 bags per year. We have two recycling bins which we fill completely every two weeks. So at my house based on your Target price, we do spend less than $16/year.

  • Salvation Army (right at bishops corner) and goodwill both gladly accept textiles for recycling: worn clothes, shoes, even socks and underwear (I launder first!) I always put my recyclable donation is a separate bag and let the attendant know so they don’t need to waste time sorting it.

  • The SIMPLE solution? Just flip the collection schedule. Pick up RECYCLE every week, and GARBAGE every other. All the numbers would fall in line, except residents wouldn’t have to pay an additional TAX. And no matter how they try to spin it (which is distasteful at best or lying at worst), this is a TAX.

    • I have been saying this same thing for years. It may get a little smelly in the summer but they could certainly pull off picking up trash every other week on cooler months. Or do what many other towns do, supply smaller garbage cans at a reduced cost that get picked up weekly. People around here i think need to see financial insentives before they change their behavior.

  • Agreeing with others; this seems like a financial issue being addressed with a disguised tax. We will not see a reduction in taxes; at best be told cost transferred in budget, but uncertain to the resident. This seems a bit onerous to have to get the right bags. Do we get a refund if one rips? What if I have larger items that do not fit in a bag. We have no town facility to take that; do we incur more fees for things that do not fit in bags but in the bin?

    I would like to see a switch of recycling and trash pickup frequency. This is a significant change that I hope will be carefully considered incorporating the thoughts and concerns of the residents.

Leave a Comment

Shares
shari cantor mobile
ryan langan mobile
mary fay mobile
beth kerrigan mobile 2017
liam sweeney mobile
davidoff mobile ad
ethel walker mobile
kaoud leaderboard
state farm leaderboard
keating leaderboard ad
French Cleaners Mobile ad
jp carrol mobile ad